"विकिपिडिया:चासोको अन्तरद्वन्द" का संशोधनहरू बिचको अन्तर

गैरभाषा
चिनोहरू: मोबाइल सम्पादन मोबाइल वेब सम्पादन
चिनोहरू: मोबाइल सम्पादन मोबाइल वेब सम्पादन
पङ्क्ति ९:
 
== चासोको अन्तरद्वन्द के हो? ==
=== External roles and relationships{{anchor|External relationships}} ===
{{Shortcut-l|WP:EXTERNALREL}}
 
While editing Wikipedia, an editor's primary role is to further the interests of the encyclopedia. When an external role or relationship could reasonably be said to undermine that primary role, the editor has a conflict of interest. (Similarly, a judge's primary role as an impartial adjudicator is undermined if she is married to the defendant.)
 
Any external relationship—personal, religious, political, academic, legal, or financial (including holding a [[cryptocurrency]])—can trigger a COI. How close the relationship needs to be before it becomes a concern on Wikipedia is governed by common sense. For example, an article about a band should not be written by the band's manager, and a biography should not be an [[Wikipedia:Autobiography|autobiography]] or written by the subject's spouse.
 
[[Subject-matter expert]]s (SMEs) are welcome on Wikipedia within their areas of expertise, subject to the guidance below on [[WP:FCOI|financial conflict of interest]] and on [[WP:SELFCITE|citing your work]]. SMEs are expected to make sure that their external roles and relationships in their field of expertise do not interfere with their primary role on Wikipedia.
 
=== COI is not simply bias{{anchor|notbias}} ===
{{further|WP:ADVOCACY}}
{{shortcut|WP:COINOTBIAS|WP:COI is not simply bias}}
Determining that someone has a COI is a '''description of a situation'''. It is not a judgment about that person's state of mind or integrity. A COI can exist in the absence of bias, and bias regularly exists in the absence of a COI. Beliefs and desires may lead to biased editing, but they do not constitute a COI. COI emerges from an editor's roles and relationships, and the ''tendency to bias'' that we assume exists when those roles and relationships conflict.
 
=== Why is conflict of interest a problem? ===
On Wikipedia, editors with a conflict of interest who unilaterally add material tend to violate Wikipedia's content and behavioral policies and guidelines. The content they add is typically unsourced or poorly sourced and often violates the [[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view]] policy by being promotional and omitting negative information. They may [[WP:Edit warring|edit war]] to retain content that serves their external interest.
 
=== Actual, potential and apparent COI ===
{{Shortcut|WP:ACTUALCOI|WP:POTENTIALCOI|WP:APPARENTCOI}}
{{anchor|actualCOI}}An '''actual COI''' exists when an editor has a COI with respect to a certain judgment ''and'' is in a position where the judgment must be exercised.
:Example: A business owner has an actual COI if he edits articles and engages in discussions about that business.
{{anchor|potentialCOI}}A '''potential COI''' exists when an editor has a COI with respect to a certain judgment ''but is not'' in a position where the judgment must be exercised.
:Example: A business owner has a potential COI with respect to articles and discussions about that business, but she has no actual COI if she stays away from those pages.
{{anchor|apparentCOI}}An '''apparent COI''' exists when there is reason to believe that an editor has a COI.
:Example: Editors have an apparent COI if they edit an article about a business, and for some reason they appear to be the business owner, although they may actually have no such connection. Apparent COI causes bad feeling within the community and should be resolved through discussion whenever possible.
 
== Dealing with edit requests from COI or paid editors{{anchor|Responding}} ==